![](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/661adb368d40162ea7167c1f/1713987756247-J1NYUPQLPVEPYZU74GD1/image-asset.jpeg)
ONGOING CASES
![Lange v. Houston County, Georgia](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/661adb368d40162ea7167c1f/d8a4d1c4-a03d-453c-ae96-3b0f558a9f8d/Lange+headshot.jpeg)
Lange v. Houston County, Georgia
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
On August 15, 2024, the Eleventh Circuit decided to reconsider en banc the recent panel ruling which upheld Ms. Lange’s right to seek coverage for gender-affirming care through her employer's healthcare plan. The order also vacated the panel’s order pending the Court’s en banc decision. The ruling may now be overturned, which could gravely affect the rights of trans employees seeking to have the costs of gender-affirming care covered by their employer's health insurance. Oral arguments will be heard by the en banc court on February 4, 2025.
![Kadel v. Folwell](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/661adb368d40162ea7167c1f/1714074924172-RQ1SZZ2Z1QHPBK5OFX2D/kadel+and+mckeown.jpg)
Kadel v. Folwell
FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
VICTORY! On April 29, 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a joint decision en banc in Kadel v. Folwell and Anderson v. Crouch, finding that healthcare plans that cover medically necessary treatments for certain diagnoses but bar coverage of those same medically necessary treatments for patients diagnosed with gender dysphoria violate federal law and the U.S. Constitution.
![Zinner v. Tennessee](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/661adb368d40162ea7167c1f/d9d40e6c-d339-46a9-9cce-38aa67f03c7e/Plaintiff+GerdeaZinner.jpeg)
Zinner v. Tennessee
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Plaintiffs Gerda Zinner and Story VanNess brought suit against the State of Tennessee, alleging that the state’s public employee health benefits program unlawfully deprived both women of coverage for essential medical services because they are transgender.